Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Lanik vs Niklas Schell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lanik vs Schell analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Lanik vs Niklas Schell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lanik 1 - 0 Schell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lanik has won 43.16% of points on their second serve, while Schell has won 46.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lanik, in recent form, has won 50.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schell has won 42.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.37% and 26.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lanik has saved 48.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schell has saved 52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lanik has won 49.02% of matches played (W/L 25/ 26), with Schell winning 28.21% (W/L 11/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lanik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Schell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 58/ 74).
- Player level: In the last year, Lanik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Schell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.73% of matches (W/L 11/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lanik winning 1 times and Schell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lanik winning 2 and Schell winning 0. The last match between Lanik and Schell was at the M15 Al Zahra, 04-11-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Tomas Lanik getting the victory 7-5 7-6(0).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lanik and Schell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lanik winning 0 times and Schell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lanik winning 1, and Schell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lanik has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.35 while Schell has played against players with an average rank of 153.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lanik has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schell has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lanik has converted 35.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schell has converted 46.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
886
Rank
886
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
864
Rank
714
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
54% (84-73)
Career Total W/L
46% (129-150)
17% (2-10)
YTD W/L
21% (3-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Lanik | Niklas Schell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (54/83) | 59% (44/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (42/54) | 64% (28/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (11/29) | 42% (13/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (34/75) | 36% (30/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(0) |
Stats 
Tomas Lanik
Player
Niklas Schell
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Lanik | Niklas Schell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (2/10) | 21% (3/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (7/21) | 26% (8/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (111/152) | 42% (125/175) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 17% (1/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.51 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.52 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.92 | 202.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (448/777) | 57% (557/977) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (264/448) | 66% (370/557) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (142/329) | 47% (196/420) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (25/71) | 47% (27/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (295/775) | 32% (283/872) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 17% (2/10) | 21% (3/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (2/12) | 15% (2/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 40% (5/2) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 60% (5/3) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Tomas Lanik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Vukadin
Player
Tomas Lanik
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaya Arinc
Player
Tomas Lanik
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christos Antonopoulos
Player
Tomas Lanik
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tomas Lanik
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Niklas Schell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Niklas Schell
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
9
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Niklas Schell
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Lenny Petit
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
11
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Garcia Mestre
Player
Niklas Schell
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
41%
(
30 of
73)
0
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Niklas Schell
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Pieri
Player
Niklas Schell
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Niklas Schell
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lanik Vs Schell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
